John Crosbie

877 total citations
27 papers, 639 citations indexed

About

John Crosbie is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, John Crosbie has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 639 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in John Crosbie's work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (13 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (7 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers). John Crosbie is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral and Psychological Studies (13 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (7 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers). John Crosbie collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. John Crosbie's co-authors include Glenn Kelly, Jack E. James, Jim Hamill, Ann D. Crocker, Christopher F. Sharpley, Jennifer M. O’Donnell, Kathryn J. Saunders, Dean C. Williams, Kennon A. Lattal and J. H. Court and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

John Crosbie

27 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Crosbie Australia 13 270 156 132 86 62 27 639
Michael A. Seaman United States 14 279 1.0× 154 1.0× 98 0.7× 93 1.1× 237 3.8× 23 1.1k
Russell E. Morgan United States 18 89 0.3× 186 1.2× 106 0.8× 115 1.3× 29 0.5× 62 1.1k
Lynae Wyckoff United States 10 406 1.5× 203 1.3× 36 0.3× 80 0.9× 73 1.2× 20 766
Leon Pesotchinsky United States 7 114 0.4× 144 0.9× 59 0.4× 126 1.5× 82 1.3× 11 680
John D. Williams United States 15 76 0.3× 352 2.3× 78 0.6× 115 1.3× 54 0.9× 73 807
W. Grant Willis United States 17 248 0.9× 272 1.7× 130 1.0× 88 1.0× 59 1.0× 30 726
Helen Steingroever Netherlands 12 102 0.4× 390 2.5× 95 0.7× 98 1.1× 77 1.2× 19 895
Allyson Washburn United States 10 99 0.4× 131 0.8× 35 0.3× 92 1.1× 21 0.3× 36 593
Donald R. Hedeker United States 7 64 0.2× 109 0.7× 285 2.2× 145 1.7× 102 1.6× 12 1.0k
Brent A. Kaplan United States 26 300 1.1× 213 1.4× 218 1.7× 118 1.4× 17 0.3× 72 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by John Crosbie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Crosbie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Crosbie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Crosbie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Crosbie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Crosbie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Crosbie. The network helps show where John Crosbie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Crosbie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Crosbie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Crosbie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Crosbie. John Crosbie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
O’Donnell, Jennifer M., John Crosbie, Dean C. Williams, & Kathryn J. Saunders. (2000). STIMULUS CONTROL AND GENERALIZATION OF POINT‐LOSS PUNISHMENT WITH HUMANS. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 73(3). 261–274. 15 indexed citations
2.
Crosbie, John, et al.. (1999). Effects of Punishment Proportion and Condition Sequence on Contrast and Induction with Humans. The Psychological Record. 49(2). 261–271. 3 indexed citations
3.
Crosbie, John, et al.. (1998). Effects of Response Cost in Computerized Programmed Instruction. The Psychological Record. 48(2). 233–250. 9 indexed citations
4.
Crosbie, John, et al.. (1998). Punishment Generalization Gradients with Humans. The Psychological Record. 48(2). 211–232. 8 indexed citations
5.
Kelly, Glenn & John Crosbie. (1997). Immediate and Delayed Effects of Imposed Postfeedback Delays in Computerized Programmed Instruction. The Psychological Record. 47(4). 687–698. 12 indexed citations
6.
Crosbie, John, et al.. (1997). SCHEDULE INTERACTIONS INVOLVING PUNISHMENT WITH PIGEONS AND HUMANS. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 68(2). 161–175. 19 indexed citations
7.
Crosbie, John & Glenn Kelly. (1994). EFFECTS OF IMPOSED POSTFEEDBACK DELAYS IN PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 27(3). 483–491. 18 indexed citations
8.
Crosbie, John. (1993). Interrupted time-series analysis with brief single-subject data.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 61(6). 966–974. 184 indexed citations
9.
Crosbie, John. (1993). Interrupted time-series analysis with brief single-subject data.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 61(6). 966–974. 159 indexed citations
10.
Crosbie, John & Glenn Kelly. (1993). A computer-based Personalized System of Instruction course in applied behavior analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 25(3). 366–370. 18 indexed citations
11.
Crosbie, John. (1993). THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE COST AND RESPONSE RESTRICTION ON A MULTIPLE‐RESPONSE REPERTOIRE WITH HUMANS. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 59(1). 173–192. 7 indexed citations
12.
Crosbie, John. (1991). The effects of punishment on unpunished reinforced free-operant responses. Australian Journal of Psychology. 43(1). 1–5. 2 indexed citations
13.
Crosbie, John. (1990). Some Effects of Response Cost on a Free-Operant Multiple-Response Repertoire with Humans. The Psychological Record. 40(4). 517–539. 2 indexed citations
14.
Crosbie, John & Christopher F. Sharpley. (1989). DMITSA: A simplified interrupted time-series analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 21(6). 639–642. 12 indexed citations
15.
Crosbie, John, et al.. (1988). A fixed interval momentary sampling method for assessing on-going behaviours induced by dopamine receptor agonists. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 12(5). 595–606. 27 indexed citations
16.
Crosbie, John, et al.. (1988). Compression Of Digitized Images For Transmission And Storage Applications. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 901. 105–105. 5 indexed citations
17.
James, Jack E., et al.. (1987). Symptomatology of habitual caffeine use amongst psychiatric patients. Australian Journal of Psychology. 39(2). 139–149. 7 indexed citations
18.
Crosbie, John. (1986). A Pascal program to perform the Bonferroni multistage multiple-correlation procedure. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 18(3). 327–329. 5 indexed citations
19.
Crosbie, John, et al.. (1984). A Pascal program to generate objective indices of group or organizational structures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 16(6). 559–561. 2 indexed citations
20.
Crosbie, John, et al.. (1982). Health funds and clinical psychological services. Australian Psychologist. 17(3). 265–276. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026