Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Duplex Kidneys: A Correlation of Renal Dysplasia with Position of the Ureteral Orifice
1975395 citationsG. Gary Mackie, F. Douglas StephensThe Journal of Urologyprofile →
THE ROLE OF TESTICULAR VASCULAR ANATOMY IN THE SALVAGE OF HIGH UNDESCENDED TESTES
1959281 citationsF. Douglas Stephens et al.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgeryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by F. Douglas Stephens
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Douglas Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Douglas Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Douglas Stephens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Douglas Stephens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Douglas Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Douglas Stephens. The network helps show where F. Douglas Stephens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Douglas Stephens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Douglas Stephens.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Douglas Stephens based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F. Douglas Stephens. F. Douglas Stephens is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pope, John C., John W. Brock, Mark C. Adams, F. Douglas Stephens, & Iekuni Ichikawa. (1999). How They Begin and How They End. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 10(9). 2018–2028.154 indexed citations
4.
Stephens, F. Douglas, Edward D. Smith, & John M. Hutson. (1996). Congenital anomalies of the urinary and genital tracts. Medical Entomology and Zoology.36 indexed citations
5.
Stephens, F. Douglas. (1988). Potential anatomic sphincters of anorectal malformations in males.. PubMed. 24(4). 155–61.4 indexed citations
Cook, William A. & F. Douglas Stephens. (1977). Fused kidneys: morphologic study and theory of embryogenesis.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 13(5). 327–40.46 indexed citations
9.
Mackie, G. Gary & F. Douglas Stephens. (1977). Duplex kidneys: a correlation of renal dysplasia with position of the ureteric orifice.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 13(5). 313–21.9 indexed citations
10.
King, P. A. & F. Douglas Stephens. (1977). Ureteral muscle tone in prevention of vesicoureteral reflux.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 14(6). 488–91.6 indexed citations
11.
Stephens, F. Douglas, et al.. (1977). Paraureteral diverticula. Associated renal morphology and embryogenesis.. PubMed. 14(5). 381–5.20 indexed citations
12.
Stephens, F. Douglas, et al.. (1976). The association and embryogenesis of tracheo-oesophageal and anorectal anomalies.. PubMed. 9. 63–76.26 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.