John C. O’Donnell

72 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

John C. O’Donnell
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 155
  • Developmental Neuroscience 97
  • Family Practice 48
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 392
  • Neurology 134
Replace Donald J. DiPette with:
Donald J. DiPette United States
Stuart A. Ross Canada
Sheila A Doggrell Australia
Paul Juneau United States
Ilaria Campesi Italy
Dick J. De Wildt Netherlands
Gordon F. Rushworth United Kingdom
Sumit Parikh United States
Nicola Montanaro Italy
J. P. Newhouse United Kingdom
John C. O’Donnell relative to Donald J. DiPette United States Donald J. DiPette's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Donald J. DiPette · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. O’Donnell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. O’Donnell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. O’Donnell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. O’Donnell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. O’Donnell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. O’Donnell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. O’Donnell. The network helps show where John C. O’Donnell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. O’Donnell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. O’Donnell Line = papers co-authored together John C. O’Donnell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011162
2 2014122
3 2015116
4
Determinants of compliance with statin therapy and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in a managed care population.
200595
5 199669
6 199666
7 202255
8 200255
9 199753
10 201051
11 201050
12 202050
13 201649
14 200938
15 201638
16 200937
17 200234
18 199828
19 201427
20 201923

About John C. O’Donnell

John C. O’Donnell is a scholar working on Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Economics and Econometrics and Molecular Biology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (15 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (12 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (9 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (8 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (8 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers) and Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (155 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (97 citations), Family Practice (48 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (392 citations) and Neurology (134 citations). John C. O’Donnell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Michael B. Robinson, Joshua G. Jackson, Tsung‐Ming Shih, John H. McDonough, Jacob W. Skovira, Ronald W. Toseland, D. Kacy Cullen, Hajime Takano, Douglas A. Coulter and Jay Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, Value in Health, Future Oncology, Journal of Neuroscience and Biomedicines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact