Steven M. Banks
- Epidemiology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Immunology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Charles NatansonPeter Q. EichackerThomas GrissoRobert L. DannerEdward P. MulveyPamela Clark RobbinsHenry J. SteadmanLoren H. Roth
- Topics
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (30 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (24 papers)Immune Response and Inflammation (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Steven M. Banks
219 papers receiving 11.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
- Epidemiology 3.6k
- Clinical Psychology 3.2k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.6k
- General Health Professions 1.5k
- Immunology 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Steven M. Banks
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven M. Banks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven M. Banks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven M. Banks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven M. Banks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven M. Banks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven M. Banks. The network helps show where Steven M. Banks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven M. Banks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven M. Banks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven M. Banks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven M. Banks. Steven M. Banks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | ADR and Litigation Involving Social Problems | 0 |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 56 | |
| 6 | 64 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 250 | |
| 10 | 181 | |
| 11 | 59 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 71 | |
| 14 | 55 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | The Rights of the homeless | 0 |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 192 | |
| 20 | 440 |
About Steven M. Banks
Steven M. Banks is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Emergency Medicine, having authored 223 papers that have together received 12.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (30 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (24 papers) and Immune Response and Inflammation (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (1.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (3.2k citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (709 citations). Steven M. Banks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Charles Natanson, Peter Q. Eichacker, Thomas Grisso, Robert L. Danner, Edward P. Mulvey, Pamela Clark Robbins, Henry J. Steadman, Loren H. Roth, John Monahan and Allard E. Dembe. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and JAMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.