John A. Toth

768 citations
26 papers · 281 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John A. Toth

26 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers

John A. Toth
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Mathematical Physics 150
  • Geometry and Topology 69
  • Applied Mathematics 80
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 78
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 30
Replace Joseph Grifone with:
Joseph Grifone France
Volker Mayer France
Michael Reeken Germany
Udo Hertrich-Jeromin Austria
Gian Paolo Leonardi Italy
Peter L. Polyakov United States
Soley Ersoy Türkiye
Ronaldo Garcia Brazil
Alexander Plakhov Portugal
Ingo Lieb Germany
John A. Toth relative to Joseph Grifone France Joseph Grifone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joseph Grifone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Toth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Toth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Toth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Toth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Toth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Toth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Toth. The network helps show where John A. Toth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside John A. Toth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John A. Toth Line = papers co-authored together John A. Toth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200768
2 200140
3 200227
4 201022
5 199614
6 201312
7 199912
8 200211
9 200710
10 20018
11 20028
12 20117
13 19986
14 19945
15 20054
16 20034
17 20014
18 20233
19
The remainder in Weyl's law for Heisenberg manifolds. II
20033
20 20142

About John A. Toth

John A. Toth is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (11 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (10 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (7 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (7 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (6 papers), advanced mathematical theories (3 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (2 papers) and Mathematical functions and polynomials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (150 citations), Geometry and Topology (69 citations), Applied Mathematics (80 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (78 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (30 citations). John A. Toth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Steve Zelditch, Bernard R. Bach, Christian Lattermann, Dmitry Jakobson, Nikolaï Nadirashvili, Christopher D. Sogge, Iosif Polterovich, Nikolai S. Nadirashvili, Maung Min-Oo and John M. Norman. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Duke Mathematical Journal, Journal of Differential Geometry, Annales Henri Poincaré and Journal of Geometric Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact