Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice
19724.3k citationsMichael D. Cohen, James G. March et al.Administrative Science Quarterlyprofile →
The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life
19831.9k citationsJames G. March, Johan P. Olsenprofile →
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations.
19771.9k citationsJames G. March, Johan P. Olsen et al.profile →
The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders
19981.2k citationsJames G. March, Johan P. Olsenprofile →
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations
1977953 citationsJames G. March, Johan P. Olsen et al.profile →
The Uncertainty of the Past: Organizational Learning Under Ambiguity
1975609 citationsJames G. March, Johan P. OlsenEuropean Journal of Political Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Johan P. Olsen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Johan P. Olsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan P. Olsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan P. Olsen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan P. Olsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan P. Olsen. The network helps show where Johan P. Olsen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johan P. Olsen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johan P. Olsen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johan P. Olsen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Johan P. Olsen. Johan P. Olsen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cohen, Michael D., James G. March, & Johan P. Olsen. (2011). El bote de basura como modelo de elección organizacional. Gestión y Política Pública. 20(2). 247–290.6 indexed citations
March, James G. & Johan P. Olsen. (1997). El ejercicio del poder desde una perspectiva institucional. Gestión y Política Pública. 6(1). 41–73.10 indexed citations
Olsen, Johan P.. (1985). Nyinstitusjonalismen og statsvitenskapen. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift. 88(1).9 indexed citations
18.
Lægreid, Per & Johan P. Olsen. (1978). Byråkrati og beslutninger : en studie av norske departement. Universitetsforlaget eBooks.5 indexed citations
19.
March, James G. & Johan P. Olsen. (1975). The Uncertainty of the Past: Organizational Learning Under Ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research. 3(2). 147–171.609 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Cohen, Michael D., James G. March, & Johan P. Olsen. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly. 17(1). 1–1.4350 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.