Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity
This map shows the geographic impact of Barry Bozeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barry Bozeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barry Bozeman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barry Bozeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barry Bozeman. The network helps show where Barry Bozeman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barry Bozeman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barry Bozeman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barry Bozeman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Barry Bozeman. Barry Bozeman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bozeman, Barry & Jan Youtie. (2017). The Strength in Numbers. Princeton University Press eBooks.35 indexed citations
7.
Bozeman, Barry. (2015). Causas, efectos y eficacia de la burocratización en las administraciones públicas nacionales: desarrollando reformas sensibles a culturas políticas singulares. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 5–32.2 indexed citations
8.
Gaughan, Monica & Barry Bozeman. (2015). Daring to Lead : Bringing Full Diversity to Academic Science and Engineering. Issues in Science and Technology. 31(2).4 indexed citations
9.
Gaughan, Monica & Barry Bozeman. (2015). Bringing full diversity to academic science and engineering. Issues in Science and Technology. 31(2). 27–31.4 indexed citations
Kingsley, Gordon & Barry Bozeman. (2014). Charting the routes to commercialization: The absorption and transfer of energy conservation technologies. International Journal of Global Energy Issues. 9. 8–15.
Feeney, Mary & Barry Bozeman. (2009). Staying Late: Comparing Work Hours in Public and Nonprofit Sectors. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
14.
Feeney, Mary & Barry Bozeman. (2008). Stakeholder Red Tape: Comparing Perceptions of Public Managers and Their Private Consultants. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
15.
Boardman, Craig, et al.. (2006). Design and the Management of Multi-institutional Research Collaborations. Research Policy. 35.5 indexed citations
16.
Boardman, Craig & Barry Bozeman. (2006). The Emergence and Impact of ‘Organic’ Research Collaboration. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 15(1).1 indexed citations
17.
Bozeman, Barry & Craig Boardman. (2004). The NSF Engineering Research Centers and the University-Industry Research Revolution. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 29.7 indexed citations
18.
Bozeman, Barry. (2003). Risk, reform and organizational culture: The case of IRS tax systems modernization. International Public Management Journal. 6(2). 117–143.4 indexed citations
19.
Bozeman, Barry & Jeffrey D. Straussman. (1984). New directions in public administration.35 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.