Joe Gerlach
- Geography, Planning and Development top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Andrew LapworthGill ClarkeDidier DebaiseClaire ColebrookDerek McCormackSebastian Abrahamsson
- Topics
- Geographies of human-animal interactions (6 papers)Geographic Information Systems Studies (4 papers)Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers)
- Journals
- Progress in Human GeographyEnvironment and Planning A Economy and SpaceTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Joe Gerlach
14 papers receiving 245 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Geography, Planning and Development 138
- Sociology and Political Science 78
- Political Science and International Relations 50
- Anthropology 35
- Cultural Studies 28
Countries citing papers authored by Joe Gerlach
This map shows the geographic impact of Joe Gerlach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joe Gerlach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joe Gerlach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joe Gerlach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joe Gerlach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joe Gerlach. The network helps show where Joe Gerlach may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joe Gerlach
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joe Gerlach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joe Gerlach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joe Gerlach. Joe Gerlach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 100 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | How to devise ethico-aesthetic practices by moving between cartography and choreography? | 1 |
About Joe Gerlach
Joe Gerlach is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Urban Studies and Cultural Studies, having authored 14 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (6 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (4 papers) and Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (138 citations), Anthropology (35 citations) and Cultural Studies (28 citations). Joe Gerlach has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Lapworth, Gill Clarke, Didier Debaise, Claire Colebrook, Derek McCormack and Sebastian Abrahamsson. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Human Geography, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space and Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.