Rachael Squire

619 total citations
17 papers, 335 citations indexed

About

Rachael Squire is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachael Squire has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 335 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Geography, Planning and Development, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Rachael Squire's work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (12 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (4 papers) and Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (4 papers). Rachael Squire is often cited by papers focused on Geographies of human-animal interactions (12 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (4 papers) and Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (4 papers). Rachael Squire collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Ireland. Rachael Squire's co-authors include Anna Jackman, Klaus Dodds, Benjamin McLellan, Leslie Mabon, Hiroyuki Matsuda, John Childs, Miguel Esteban, Philip E. Steinberg, Simon Dalby and Joanne Sharp and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Environment and Planning D Society and Space and Ocean & Coastal Management.

In The Last Decade

Rachael Squire

16 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Rachael Squire
Elizabeth Baigent United Kingdom
Levi Van Sant United States
Steve Hemming Australia
Stefanie Fishel Australia
Daryle Rigney Australia
Kai Bosworth United States
Elizabeth Baigent United Kingdom
Rachael Squire
Citations per year, relative to Rachael Squire Rachael Squire (= 1×) peers Elizabeth Baigent

Countries citing papers authored by Rachael Squire

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachael Squire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachael Squire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachael Squire more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachael Squire

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachael Squire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachael Squire. The network helps show where Rachael Squire may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachael Squire

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachael Squire. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachael Squire based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachael Squire. Rachael Squire is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Jackman, Anna & Rachael Squire. (2023). Swirling, splashing, slowing: Towards gentle volumes. Political Geography. 106. 102964–102964. 7 indexed citations
2.
Squire, Rachael. (2023). Finding place in extremes. Dialogues in Human Geography. 14(2). 264–268. 2 indexed citations
3.
Squire, Rachael, et al.. (2022). Toward Analog Geographies: Moving with and beyond Enclosure. GeoHumanities. 8(2). 518–536. 4 indexed citations
4.
Koopman, Sara, Simon Dalby, Nick Megoran, et al.. (2021). Critical Geopolitics/critical geopolitics 25 years on. Political Geography. 90. 102421–102421. 23 indexed citations
5.
Jackman, Anna & Rachael Squire. (2021). Forging volumetric methods. Area. 53(3). 492–500. 33 indexed citations
6.
Squire, Rachael. (2021). Undersea Geopolitics. Rowman & Littlefield eBooks. 1 indexed citations
7.
Squire, Rachael. (2021). Where theories of terrain might land: Towards ‘pluriversal’ engagements with terrain. Dialogues in Human Geography. 11(2). 208–212. 5 indexed citations
8.
Jackman, Anna, et al.. (2020). Unearthing feminist territories and terrains. Political Geography. 80. 102180–102180. 49 indexed citations
9.
Childs, John, Philip E. Steinberg, Leslie Mabon, et al.. (2020). A critical social perspective on deep sea mining: Lessons from the emergent industry in Japan. Ocean & Coastal Management. 193. 105242–105242. 29 indexed citations
10.
Squire, Rachael. (2020). Companions, zappers, and invaders: The animal geopolitics of Sealab I, II, and III (1964–1969). Political Geography. 82. 102224–102224. 22 indexed citations
11.
Peters, Kimberley & Rachael Squire. (2019). Oceanic Travels. Transfers. 9(2). 101–111. 4 indexed citations
12.
Squire, Rachael & Klaus Dodds. (2019). Introduction to the Special Issue: Subterranean Geopolitics. Geopolitics. 25(1). 4–16. 55 indexed citations
13.
Squire, Rachael, et al.. (2018). Dome, sweet home: climate shelters past, present and future. Nature. 2 indexed citations
14.
Squire, Rachael. (2017). “Do you dive?”: Methodological considerations for engaging with “volume”. Geography Compass. 11(7). 28 indexed citations
16.
Squire, Rachael. (2016). Immersive terrain: the US Navy, Sealab and Cold War undersea geopolitics. Area. 48(3). 332–338. 25 indexed citations
17.
Squire, Rachael. (2015). Rock, water, air and fire: Foregrounding the elements in the Gibraltar-Spain dispute. Environment and Planning D Society and Space. 34(3). 545–563. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026