Jodie Smith

779 citations
31 papers · 484 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jodie Smith

28 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

Jodie Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 261
  • Ceramics and Composites 46
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 94
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 314
  • Computational Mechanics 77
Replace S. Matsuo with:
S. Matsuo Japan
You-Nian Wang China
C. Méndez Spain
Quan Dong China
J. W. Glesener United States
P. Thompson United Kingdom
A. Nehari France
Martin Smrž Czechia
Amy L. Rigatti United States
A.P. Kobzev Russia
Jodie Smith relative to S. Matsuo Japan S. Matsuo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
S. Matsuo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jodie Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jodie Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jodie Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jodie Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jodie Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jodie Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jodie Smith. The network helps show where Jodie Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jodie Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jodie Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jodie Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20247
2 20231
3 202113
4 202111
5 202012
6 202016
7 20192
8 20196
9 20178
10 201713
11 20172
12 2017121
13 201624
14 20161
15 20152
16 20153
17 20151
18 20142
19 201327
20 201240

About Jodie Smith

Jodie Smith is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Ecological Modeling and Radiation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solid State Laser Technologies (22 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (15 papers), Laser Design and Applications (14 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (8 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (5 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (5 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (4 papers) and Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (261 citations), Ceramics and Composites (46 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (94 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (314 citations) and Computational Mechanics (77 citations). Jodie Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Czechia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Butcher, Paul Mason, Mariastefania De Vido, Saumyabrata Banerjee, Klaus Ertel, John Collier, Cristina Hernandez–Gomez, Jonathan Phillips, Chris Edwards and Jan Pilař. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Optics Letters, Optical Materials Express, High Power Laser Science and Engineering and Journal of Materials Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026