Countries where authors publish in High Power Laser Science and Engineering
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites High Power Laser Science and Engineering more than expected).
Fields of papers published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering
This network shows the impact of papers published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering.
About High Power Laser Science and Engineering
The 630 papers published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations . Papers published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (280 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (387 papers) and Radiation (57 papers) specifically the topics of Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (279 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (245 papers) and Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (167 papers). The most active scholars publishing in High Power Laser Science and Engineering are C. Danson, D. Neely, David Hillier, N. W. Hopps, K. Falk, Pu Zhou, Е. А. Хазанов, Pengfei Ma, Jianqiang Zhu and Xiao Hu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.