C. J. Hooker

2.1k total citations
70 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

C. J. Hooker is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, C. J. Hooker has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 40 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 35 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in C. J. Hooker's work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (42 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (40 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (30 papers). C. J. Hooker is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (42 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (40 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (30 papers). C. J. Hooker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. C. J. Hooker's co-authors include E. J. Divall, M. J. Shaw, A. J. Langley, Klaus Ertel, John Collier, M. H. Key, I. N. Ross, Steve Hawkes, O. Willi and O. Chekhlov and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

In The Last Decade

C. J. Hooker

67 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. J. Hooker United Kingdom 22 910 741 464 462 154 70 1.3k
W. Ziegler Germany 17 827 0.9× 1.0k 1.4× 362 0.8× 455 1.0× 227 1.5× 30 1.5k
Mikhail Kalashnikov Germany 19 1.1k 1.2× 837 1.1× 405 0.9× 495 1.1× 124 0.8× 105 1.4k
K. Kondo Japan 24 1.3k 1.4× 1.1k 1.5× 315 0.7× 675 1.5× 197 1.3× 122 1.8k
A. Sagisaka Japan 22 1.0k 1.1× 1.1k 1.5× 251 0.5× 564 1.2× 258 1.7× 71 1.5k
J. Jacoby Germany 15 494 0.5× 597 0.8× 260 0.6× 355 0.8× 199 1.3× 83 989
Sergei Tochitsky United States 19 1.1k 1.2× 755 1.0× 740 1.6× 469 1.0× 187 1.2× 84 1.6k
B. Rus Czechia 20 908 1.0× 756 1.0× 526 1.1× 475 1.0× 116 0.8× 154 1.4k
C. J. Keane United States 21 1.0k 1.2× 714 1.0× 224 0.5× 696 1.5× 191 1.2× 33 1.4k
B. Sharkov Russia 22 615 0.7× 863 1.2× 299 0.6× 558 1.2× 222 1.4× 124 1.3k
G. Maynard France 16 728 0.8× 552 0.7× 149 0.3× 321 0.7× 93 0.6× 93 937

Countries citing papers authored by C. J. Hooker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. J. Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. J. Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. J. Hooker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. J. Hooker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. J. Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. J. Hooker. The network helps show where C. J. Hooker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. J. Hooker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. J. Hooker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. J. Hooker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. J. Hooker. C. J. Hooker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Scott, R. H. H., N. Booth, Sarah Hawkes, et al.. (2020). Modeling radiative-shocks created by laser–cluster interactions. Physics of Plasmas. 27(3). 3 indexed citations
2.
Scott, R. H. H., Nicolas Bourgeois, Jens Osterhoff, et al.. (2020). Electron trapping and reinjection in prepulse-shaped gas targets for laser-plasma accelerators. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams. 23(11). 1 indexed citations
3.
Vido, Mariastefania De, Klaus Ertel, Paul Mason, et al.. (2017). A 100J-level nanosecond pulsed DPSSL for pumping high-efficiency, high-repetition rate PW-class lasers. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 10082. 100820M–100820M. 5 indexed citations
4.
Ursescu, D., G. Chériaux, P. Audebert, et al.. (2016). Laser beam delivery at ELI-NP. Science and Technology Facilities Council. 3 indexed citations
5.
Galletti, M., M. Galimberti, C. J. Hooker, et al.. (2016). An ultra short pulse reconstruction software applied to the GEMINI high power laser system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 829. 442–445. 4 indexed citations
6.
Hooker, C. J., O. Chekhlov, John Collier, et al.. (2011). Improving coherent contrast of petawatt laser pulses. Optics Express. 19(3). 2193–2193. 52 indexed citations
7.
Kaluza, Malte C., S. P. D. Mangles, A. G. R. Thomas, et al.. (2010). Observation of a Long-Wavelength Hosing Modulation of a High-Intensity Laser Pulse in Underdense Plasma. Physical Review Letters. 105(9). 95003–95003. 17 indexed citations
8.
Hooker, C. J., John Collier, O. Chekhlov, et al.. (2009). The Astra Gemini Petawatt Ti:Sapphire Laser. The Review of Laser Engineering. 37(6). 443–448. 6 indexed citations
9.
Ertel, Klaus, et al.. (2008). ASE suppression in a high energy Titanium sapphire amplifier. Optics Express. 16(11). 8039–8039. 64 indexed citations
10.
McKenna, J. A., B. Srigengan, I. D. Williams, et al.. (2006). Ultrafast ionization study ofN2in intense linearly and circularly polarized laser fields. Physical Review A. 73(4). 27 indexed citations
11.
Khattak, F. Y., D. Riley, P. S. Foster, et al.. (2006). Comparison of experimental and simulatedKαyield for400nmultrashort pulse laser irradiation. Physical Review E. 74(2). 27401–27401. 16 indexed citations
12.
Mangles, S. P. D., C. D. Murphy, Z. Najmudin, et al.. (2005). Observation of Monoenergetic Relativistic Electron Beams from Intense Laser - Plasma Interactions. 3. 1479–1481. 1 indexed citations
13.
Spencer, I., K. W. D. Ledingham, P. McKenna, et al.. (2003). Experimental study of proton emission from 60-fs, 200-mJ high-repetition-rate tabletop-laser pulses interacting with solid targets. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 67(4). 46402–46402. 72 indexed citations
14.
Osvay, K., G. Kurdi, J. Klebniczki, et al.. (2002). Broadband amplification of ultraviolet laser pulses. Applied Physics B. 74(S1). s163–s169. 10 indexed citations
15.
Hooker, C. J., et al.. (1995). Novel Four-Wave Mixing Phenomenon in a Raman Amplifier. Physical Review Letters. 74(21). 4197–4200. 4 indexed citations
16.
Shaw, M. J., B. Edwards, Graeme Hirst, et al.. (1993). Development of high-performance KrF and Raman laser facilities for inertial confinement fusion and other applications. Laser and Particle Beams. 11(2). 331–346. 7 indexed citations
17.
Harvey, Erol C., C. J. Hooker, M. H. Key, et al.. (1991). Picosecond gain and saturation measurements in a KrF laser amplifier depumped by amplified spontaneous emission. Journal of Applied Physics. 70(10). 5238–5245. 15 indexed citations
18.
Bell, A. R., et al.. (1988). Collisionless shock in a laser-produced ablating plasma. Physical review. A, General physics. 38(3). 1363–1369. 40 indexed citations
19.
Chenais-Popovics, C., R. Corbett, C. J. Hooker, et al.. (1987). Laser amplification at 18.2 nm in recombining plasma from a laser-irradiated carbon fiber. Physical Review Letters. 59(19). 2161–2164. 117 indexed citations
20.
Toner, W.T., A. R. Bell, R.W. Eason, et al.. (1986). Fusion related experiments at the central laser facility. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 28(1A). 239–242. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by W. Ziegler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mikhail Kalashnikov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K. Kondo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Sagisaka Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Jacoby Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sergei Tochitsky Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. Rus Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. J. Keane Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. Sharkov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. Maynard
Rankless by CCL
2026