Jochem N. A. Vink
- Molecular Biology
- Biophysics top 5%
- Genetics
- Plant Science
- Insect Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stan J. J. BrounsAnna C. HaagsmaCristóbal AlmendrosSam P. B. van BeljouwJohannes HohlbeinRebecca E. McKenzieKoen J.A. MartensDaan F. van den Berg
- Topics
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (8 papers)Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (4 papers)Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (4 papers)
- Journals
- NatureScienceNature Communications
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsNew ZealandGermany
In The Last Decade
Jochem N. A. Vink
22 papers receiving 444 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Molecular Biology 340
- Biophysics 69
- Genetics 67
- Plant Science 64
- Insect Science 59
Countries citing papers authored by Jochem N. A. Vink
This map shows the geographic impact of Jochem N. A. Vink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochem N. A. Vink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochem N. A. Vink more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jochem N. A. Vink
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochem N. A. Vink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochem N. A. Vink. The network helps show where Jochem N. A. Vink may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jochem N. A. Vink
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jochem N. A. Vink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jochem N. A. Vink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jochem N. A. Vink. Jochem N. A. Vink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 68 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 35 | |
| 13 | 67 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 84 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 548 A palynological study of Neogene fluvial sediments of SW Amazonia (Madre de Dios foreland Basin, Peru) with inferences for paleo-biodiversity studies | 1 |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Jochem N. A. Vink
Jochem N. A. Vink is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Biophysics and Business and International Management, having authored 22 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (8 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (4 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (26 citations), Business and International Management (26 citations) and Biophysics (69 citations). Jochem N. A. Vink has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, New Zealand and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stan J. J. Brouns, Anna C. Haagsma, Cristóbal Almendros, Sam P. B. van Beljouw, Johannes Hohlbein, Rebecca E. McKenzie, Koen J.A. Martens, Daan F. van den Berg, Wolfgang R. Hess and Franklin L. Nóbrega. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.