Ana Rita Costa
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Ecology top 1%
- Microbiology top 0.5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Co-authors
- Joana AzeredoDiana P. PiresMariana HenriquesFranklin L. NóbregaRosário OliveiraMaria Elisa RodriguesStan J. J. BrounsRodrigo Monteiro
- Topics
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (26 papers)Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (13 papers)Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (12 papers)
- Cited by
- MicrobiologyEcologyEndocrinology
- Partner nations
- PortugalNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ana Rita Costa
45 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Ecology 1.4k
- Microbiology 566
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 337
- Infectious Diseases 277
Countries citing papers authored by Ana Rita Costa
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Rita Costa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Rita Costa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Rita Costa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Rita Costa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Rita Costa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Rita Costa. The network helps show where Ana Rita Costa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana Rita Costa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana Rita Costa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana Rita Costa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana Rita Costa. Ana Rita Costa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | Mechanisms and clinical importance of bacteriophage resistancebreakdown → | 182 |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 84 | |
| 13 | 237 | |
| 14 | 117 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 72 | |
| 19 | 125 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Ana Rita Costa
Ana Rita Costa is a scholar working on Microbiology, Ecology and Endocrinology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (26 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (13 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (566 citations), Ecology (1.4k citations) and Endocrinology (263 citations). Ana Rita Costa has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joana Azeredo, Diana P. Pires, Mariana Henriques, Franklin L. Nóbrega, Rosário Oliveira, Maria Elisa Rodrigues, Stan J. J. Brouns, Rodrigo Monteiro, Leon Kluskens and Pieter‐Jan Haas. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and Molecular Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.