Joaquím Forés
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Xavier NavarroEnrique VerdúRubén López‐ValesGuillermo García‐AlíasCaty CasasClara PenasAntoni Valero‐CabréDolores Ceballos
- Topics
- Nerve injury and regeneration (26 papers)Spinal Cord Injury Research (13 papers)Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental NeuroscienceCellular and Molecular NeurosciencePathology and Forensic Medicine
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Joaquím Forés
31 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 961
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 540
- Developmental Neuroscience 469
- Molecular Biology 275
- Surgery 222
Countries citing papers authored by Joaquím Forés
This map shows the geographic impact of Joaquím Forés's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joaquím Forés with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joaquím Forés more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joaquím Forés
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joaquím Forés. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joaquím Forés. The network helps show where Joaquím Forés may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joaquím Forés
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joaquím Forés. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joaquím Forés based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joaquím Forés. Joaquím Forés is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 51 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 53 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 142 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 94 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 103 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 78 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 68 |
About Joaquím Forés
Joaquím Forés is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (26 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (13 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (469 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (961 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (540 citations). Joaquím Forés has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Xavier Navarro, Enrique Verdú, Rubén López‐Vales, Guillermo García‐Alías, Caty Casas, Clara Penas, Antoni Valero‐Cabré, Dolores Ceballos, Francisco Javier Rodríguez and Esther Udina. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Scientific Reports and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.