João L. Costa
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Mathematical Physics
- Co-authors
- Vítor CardosoKyriakos DestounisAron JansenPeter HintzJosé NatárioRaimon LunaMiguel ZilhãoRui Rodrigues
- Topics
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (16 papers)Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
João L. Costa
21 papers receiving 432 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 413
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 399
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 64
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 51
- Mathematical Physics 37
Countries citing papers authored by João L. Costa
This map shows the geographic impact of João L. Costa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by João L. Costa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites João L. Costa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by João L. Costa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by João L. Costa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by João L. Costa. The network helps show where João L. Costa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of João L. Costa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of João L. Costa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of João L. Costa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with João L. Costa. João L. Costa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | Quasinormal Modes and Strong Cosmic Censorshipbreakdown → | 194 |
| 10 | 76 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | On the global uniqueness for the Einstein–Maxwell-scalar field system with a cosmological constant: I. Well posedness and breakdown criterion | 24 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | On black hole uniqueness theorems | 6 |
| 20 | 8 |
About João L. Costa
João L. Costa is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (16 papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (399 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (413 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (64 citations). João L. Costa has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Vítor Cardoso, Kyriakos Destounis, Aron Jansen, Peter Hintz, José Natário, Raimon Luna, Miguel Zilhão, Rui Rodrigues, José M. Mourão and Zhen Zhong. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Communications in Mathematical Physics and Physical review. D.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.