José Natário
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ricardo SchiappaL. Filipe O. CostaVítor CardosoJoão L. CostaMiguel ZilhãoRodrigo VicentePaolo PaniCarlos Herdeiro
- Topics
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (34 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (26 papers)Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
José Natário
46 papers receiving 686 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 621
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 528
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 143
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 58
- Mathematical Physics 56
Countries citing papers authored by José Natário
This map shows the geographic impact of José Natário's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Natário with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Natário more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José Natário
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Natário. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Natário. The network helps show where José Natário may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Natário
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Natário. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Natário based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José Natário. José Natário is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | On the global uniqueness for the Einstein–Maxwell-scalar field system with a cosmological constant: I. Well posedness and breakdown criterion | 24 |
| 18 | Gravitational Collapse to Toroidal and Higher Genus asymptotically AdS Black Holes | 5 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About José Natário
José Natário is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 708 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (34 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (26 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (528 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (621 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (143 citations). José Natário has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ricardo Schiappa, L. Filipe O. Costa, Vítor Cardoso, João L. Costa, Miguel Zilhão, Rodrigo Vicente, Paolo Pani, Carlos Herdeiro, Guilherme Raposo and Raimon Luna. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Communications in Mathematical Physics and American Journal of Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.