Joan W. Scott
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Gender Studies top 0.5%
- History top 0.05%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Anthropology top 2%
- Topics
- Academic Freedom and Politics (2 papers)Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (2 papers)French Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaContemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsThe American Historical Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesVenezuela
In The Last Decade
Joan W. Scott
20 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Sociology and Political Science 1.4k
- Gender Studies 711
- History 522
- Political Science and International Relations 412
- Anthropology 204
Countries citing papers authored by Joan W. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Joan W. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan W. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan W. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joan W. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan W. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan W. Scott. The network helps show where Joan W. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joan W. Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joan W. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joan W. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joan W. Scott. Joan W. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | The Conundrum of Equality | 3 |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 94 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | Les dones a The Making of the English Working Class | 2 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Prefácio a Gender and Politics of History | 26 |
| 13 | 89 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | How did the male become the normative standard for clinical drug trials? | 1 |
| 16 | The Evidence of Experiencebreakdown → | 975 |
| 17 | 65 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysisbreakdown → | 1062 |
| 20 | 52 |
About Joan W. Scott
Joan W. Scott is a scholar working on General Psychology, History and Cultural Studies, having authored 24 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic Freedom and Politics (2 papers), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (2 papers) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (711 citations), History (522 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.4k citations). Joan W. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Venezuela. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Nye, Paul Schiff Berman, Natalie Zemon Davis and Patricia Ticineto Clough. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.