Joan Cocks
Impact in
- Public Administration top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
Papers in
-
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 2
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 2
- Race, History, and American Society 1
- Sociology and Norbert Elias 1
-
- Violence, Religion, and Philosophy 1
- Co-authors
- Mona Harrington (1 shared paper)Yves Winter (1 shared paper)Thomas Biebricher (1 shared paper)Antonio Y. Vázquez‐Arroyo (1 shared paper)Andrew Dilts (1 shared paper)Qiuping A. Wang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Perspectives on Politics (2 papers)Politics & Society (1 paper)Political Studies (1 paper)Interventions (1 paper)differences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceGermany
In The Last Decade
Joan Cocks
19 papers receiving 558 citations
Joan Cocks's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Public Administration 26
- Gender Studies 69
- Sociology and Political Science 251
- Political Science and International Relations 121
- General Health Professions 122
Countries citing papers authored by Joan Cocks
This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Cocks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Cocks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Cocks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Cocks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Cocks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Cocks. The network helps show where Joan Cocks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Joan Cocks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 486 |
| 2 | 1988 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 11 | Cultural theory looks at identity and contradiction | 1990 | 2 |
| 12 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 1 |
About Joan Cocks
Joan Cocks is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, History and Clinical Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Catholicism and Religious Studies (1 paper), Violence, Religion, and Philosophy (1 paper), Race, History, and American Society (1 paper) and Sociology and Norbert Elias (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (26 citations), Gender Studies (69 citations), Sociology and Political Science (251 citations), Political Science and International Relations (121 citations) and General Health Professions (122 citations). Joan Cocks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mona Harrington, Yves Winter, Thomas Biebricher, Antonio Y. Vázquez‐Arroyo, Andrew Dilts and Qiuping A. Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Perspectives on Politics, Politics & Society, Political Studies, Interventions and differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.