Joachim Szécsényi
- General Health Professions top 0.1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Co-authors
- Thomas RosemannMichel WensingStefanie JoosGunter LauxAntje MikschDominik OseKatja GoetzCornelia Mahler
- Topics
- Chronic Disease Management Strategies (93 papers)Health and Medical Studies (68 papers)Primary Care and Health Outcomes (68 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnnals of Internal MedicinePLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Joachim Szécsényi
419 papers receiving 8.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
- General Health Professions 3.9k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.8k
- Epidemiology 1.7k
- Economics and Econometrics 1.5k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 928
Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Szécsényi
This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Szécsényi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Szécsényi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Szécsényi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Szécsényi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Szécsényi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Szécsényi. The network helps show where Joachim Szécsényi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joachim Szécsényi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joachim Szécsényi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joachim Szécsényi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joachim Szécsényi. Joachim Szécsényi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | The influence of workload and health behavior on job satisfaction of general practitioners. | 54 |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 121 |
About Joachim Szécsényi
Joachim Szécsényi is a scholar working on Family Practice, General Health Professions and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 433 papers that have together received 9.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (93 papers), Health and Medical Studies (68 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (68 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (589 citations), General Health Professions (3.9k citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (446 citations). Joachim Szécsényi has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Rosemann, Michel Wensing, Stefanie Joos, Gunter Laux, Antje Miksch, Dominik Ose, Katja Goetz, Cornelia Mahler, Frank Peters-Klimm and Tobias Freund. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of Internal Medicine and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.