Ingmar Schäfer
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
- Frailty in Older Adults
- Health top 2%
- Health disparities and outcomes
Papers in
-
- Health and Medical Studies 16
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 8
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 7
- Co-authors
- Hendrik van den BusscheMartin SchererGerhard SchönHeike HansenBirgitt WieseGerd GlaeskeKarl WegscheiderJochen Gensichen
- Journals
- BMJ Open (13 papers)BMC Family Practice (10 papers)BMC Health Services Research (6 papers)PLoS ONE (4 papers)BMC Public Health (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Ingmar Schäfer
67 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 259
- Health 347
- Epidemiology 1.1k
- General Health Professions 782
- Family Practice 56
Countries citing papers authored by Ingmar Schäfer
This map shows the geographic impact of Ingmar Schäfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingmar Schäfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingmar Schäfer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ingmar Schäfer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingmar Schäfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingmar Schäfer. The network helps show where Ingmar Schäfer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingmar Schäfer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 52 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 74 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 166 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 19 |
About Ingmar Schäfer
Ingmar Schäfer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine and Health, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (44 papers), Health and Medical Studies (16 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (14 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (13 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (9 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (7 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (259 citations), Health (347 citations), Epidemiology (1.1k citations), General Health Professions (782 citations) and Family Practice (56 citations). Ingmar Schäfer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Hendrik van den Bussche, Martin Scherer, Gerhard Schön, Heike Hansen, Birgitt Wiese, Gerd Glaeske, Karl Wegscheider, Jochen Gensichen, Hans‐Helmut König and Siegfried Weyerer. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, BMC Family Practice, BMC Health Services Research, PLoS ONE and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.