Joachim Stoeber
- Clinical Psychology top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Co-authors
- Kathleen OttoJulian Edbrooke‐ChildsClaudia DalbertOliver StollDaniel J. MadiganLouis PassfieldLavinia E. DamianSimon Sherry
- Topics
- Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (94 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (40 papers)Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (27 papers)
- Journals
- Child DevelopmentPersonality and Individual DifferencesPersonality and Social Psychology Review
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyRomania
In The Last Decade
Joachim Stoeber
101 papers receiving 6.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Clinical Psychology 5.8k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.2k
- Social Psychology 3.0k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.9k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 738
Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Stoeber
This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Stoeber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Stoeber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Stoeber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Stoeber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Stoeber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Stoeber. The network helps show where Joachim Stoeber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joachim Stoeber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joachim Stoeber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joachim Stoeber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joachim Stoeber. Joachim Stoeber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 61 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT IN ADOLESCENTS: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE 2 X 2 MODEL OF PERFECTIONISM | 19 |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 84 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 165 | |
| 20 | 140 |
About Joachim Stoeber
Joachim Stoeber is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 102 papers that have together received 7.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (94 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (40 papers) and Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (5.8k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.2k citations) and Social Psychology (3.0k citations). Joachim Stoeber has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen Otto, Julian Edbrooke‐Childs, Claudia Dalbert, Oliver Stoll, Daniel J. Madigan, Louis Passfield, Lavinia E. Damian, Simon Sherry, Hongfei Yang and Alexandra Feast. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Personality and Individual Differences and Personality and Social Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.