Joachim Stoeber

10.8k citations
102 papers · 7.3k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 47

Joachim Stoeber

101 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Hit Papers

Positive Conceptions of Perfectionism: Approaches, Eviden...1.2k20062026201220194008001.2k

Peers

Joachim Stoeber
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Clinical Psychology 5.8k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.2k
  • Social Psychology 3.0k
  • Music 204
  • Applied Psychology 305
Replace Robert W. Roeser with:
Robert W. Roeser United States
Kirk R. Blankstein Canada
Wim Beyers Belgium
Kimberly A. Schonert‐Reichl Canada
Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers Netherlands
Robert L. Leahy United States
Ivanna K. Guthrie United States
Susanne A. Denham United States
Xinyin Chen United States
Windy Dryden United Kingdom
Joachim Stoeber relative to Robert W. Roeser United States Robert W. Roeser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Robert W. Roeser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Stoeber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Stoeber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Stoeber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Stoeber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Stoeber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Stoeber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Stoeber. The network helps show where Joachim Stoeber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joachim Stoeber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joachim Stoeber Line = papers co-authored together Joachim Stoeber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202112
2 202115
3 201817
4 201728
5 201714
6 201611
7 201628
8 201638
9 201561
10 201532
11
POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT IN ADOLESCENTS: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE 2 X 2 MODEL OF PERFECTIONISM
201419
12 201428
13 201427
14 201430
15 20136
16 201325
17 201184
18 201037
19 2009165
20 2009140

About Joachim Stoeber

Joachim Stoeber is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 102 papers that have together received 7.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (94 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (40 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (27 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (24 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (19 papers), Mind wandering and attention (17 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (16 papers) and Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (5.8k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.2k citations) and Social Psychology (3.0k citations). Joachim Stoeber has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen Otto, Julian Edbrooke‐Childs, Claudia Dalbert, Oliver Stoll, Daniel J. Madigan, Louis Passfield, Lavinia E. Damian, Simon Sherry, Hongfei Yang and Alexandra Feast. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Personality and Individual Differences and Personality and Social Psychology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026