Joachim Offenberg
- Genetics top 2%
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Ecology top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sara FratiniStefano CannicciThomas J. SmithDamien BurrowsFarid Dahdouh‐GuebasMogens Gissel NielsenDecha WiwatwitayaDonald Macintosh
- Topics
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (61 papers)Plant and animal studies (49 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (36 papers)
In The Last Decade
Joachim Offenberg
65 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Genetics 830
- Insect Science 756
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 742
- Ecology 458
- Plant Science 235
Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Offenberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Offenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Offenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Offenberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Offenberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Offenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Offenberg. The network helps show where Joachim Offenberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joachim Offenberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joachim Offenberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joachim Offenberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joachim Offenberg. Joachim Offenberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | Effect of caffeine and gamma-aminobutyric acid on preference for sugar solutions in two ant species | 0 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Pest repelling properties of ant pheromones | 4 |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Joachim Offenberg
Joachim Offenberg is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (61 papers), Plant and animal studies (49 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (36 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (756 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (742 citations) and Genetics (830 citations). Joachim Offenberg has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Tanzania and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sara Fratini, Stefano Cannicci, Thomas J. Smith, Damien Burrows, Farid Dahdouh‐Guebas, Mogens Gissel Nielsen, Decha Wiwatwitaya, Donald Macintosh, Christian Damgaard and Sanit Aksornkoae. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Ecology and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.