J.M. van Baalen
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Neurology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- J. Hajo van BockelGeert Willem H. SchurinkLeo J. Schultze KoolN.J.M. AartsJ. KievitI. DawsonAndel G. L. van der MeyTimothy A.M. Chuter
- Topics
- Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (10 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (8 papers)Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
J.M. van Baalen
19 papers receiving 868 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 726
- Surgery 408
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 335
- Neurology 149
- Epidemiology 103
Countries citing papers authored by J.M. van Baalen
This map shows the geographic impact of J.M. van Baalen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M. van Baalen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M. van Baalen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.M. van Baalen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M. van Baalen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M. van Baalen. The network helps show where J.M. van Baalen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.M. van Baalen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.M. van Baalen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.M. van Baalen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.M. van Baalen. J.M. van Baalen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 81 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 71 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 142 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 57 | |
| 12 | 132 | |
| 13 | 132 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 73 | |
| 19 | Doppler ultrasound diagnosis of complications of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft shunts. | 2 |
About J.M. van Baalen
J.M. van Baalen is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 19 papers that have together received 930 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (10 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (8 papers) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (726 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (335 citations) and Neurology (149 citations). J.M. van Baalen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include J. Hajo van Bockel, Geert Willem H. Schurink, Leo J. Schultze Kool, N.J.M. Aarts, J. Kievit, I. Dawson, Andel G. L. van der Mey, Timothy A.M. Chuter, G.W.H. Schurink and Johan L. Bloem. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, British journal of surgery and American Journal of Roentgenology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.