Jan Baan
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Emergency Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Enno T. van der VeldePaul SteendijkArjan D. van DijkJ KoopsB. BuisG. SmeenkJoan M. SendenHein G. de Bruin
- Topics
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (14 papers)Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (13 papers)Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (12 papers)
- Journals
- CirculationJournal of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsItalyJapan
In The Last Decade
Jan Baan
58 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.7k
- Surgery 1.1k
- Biomedical Engineering 741
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 406
- Emergency Medicine 386
Countries citing papers authored by Jan Baan
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Baan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Baan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Baan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Baan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Baan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Baan. The network helps show where Jan Baan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Baan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Baan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Baan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Baan. Jan Baan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 90 | |
| 5 | 56 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 50 | |
| 19 | Vascular medicine from endothelium to myocardium | 1 |
| 20 | 12 |
About Jan Baan
Jan Baan is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Emergency Medicine, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (14 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (13 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.7k citations), Emergency Medicine (386 citations) and Surgery (1.1k citations). Jan Baan has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Enno T. van der Velde, Paul Steendijk, Arjan D. van Dijk, J Koops, B. Buis, G. Smeenk, Joan M. Senden, Hein G. de Bruin, Jan J. Piek and Marije M. Vis. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.