Jing Liao
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Surgery
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (20 papers)Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (12 papers)Chronic Disease Management Strategies (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jing Liao
93 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- General Health Professions 266
- Health 187
- Epidemiology 150
- Surgery 141
- Clinical Psychology 132
Countries citing papers authored by Jing Liao
This map shows the geographic impact of Jing Liao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jing Liao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jing Liao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jing Liao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jing Liao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jing Liao. The network helps show where Jing Liao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jing Liao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jing Liao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jing Liao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jing Liao. Jing Liao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Growing old in China in socioeconomic and epidemiological context: systematic review of social care policy for older peoplebreakdown → | 55 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Psychological status of nursing survivors in China and its associated factors: 6 years after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake | 1 |
| 18 | 60 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | Relation between working status and health-related quality of life among health educators in junior high schools | 0 |
About Jing Liao
Jing Liao is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 104 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (20 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (12 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (49 citations), Health (187 citations) and General Health Professions (266 citations). Jing Liao has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eric J. Brunner, Yuantao Hao, Shaun Scholes, Dong Xu, Jiong Tu, Zhicheng Du, Hui Yuan, Jiayu He, Ying Wang and Man Li. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.