Jim Dewald
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Business and International Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Frances BowenOleksiy OsiyevskyyLucie LaurianChad SaundersRichard HawkinsSimon O. RabySoumodip Sarkar
- Topics
- Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers)COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (2 papers)Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Business and International ManagementManagement of Technology and InnovationStrategy and Management
- Journals
- Entrepreneurship Theory and PracticeLong Range PlanningJournal of Small Business Management
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
Jim Dewald
9 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Strategy and Management 170
- Management of Technology and Innovation 126
- Economics and Econometrics 81
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 60
- Business and International Management 53
Countries citing papers authored by Jim Dewald
This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Dewald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Dewald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Dewald more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Dewald
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Dewald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Dewald. The network helps show where Jim Dewald may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jim Dewald
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jim Dewald. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jim Dewald based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jim Dewald. Jim Dewald is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 53 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 160 |
About Jim Dewald
Jim Dewald is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, General Social Sciences and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (2 papers) and Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (53 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (126 citations) and Strategy and Management (170 citations). Jim Dewald has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Frances Bowen, Oleksiy Osiyevskyy, Lucie Laurian, Chad Saunders, Richard Hawkins, Simon O. Raby and Soumodip Sarkar. Their work appears in journals such as Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Long Range Planning and Journal of Small Business Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.