Jill Roe
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- History top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Economics and Econometrics
- Finance
- Co-authors
- Hugh StrettonEric FryDavid GreenJoy DamousiDonald HorneMarilyn LakeJoseph MellingAlan Powell
- Topics
- Australian History and Society (9 papers)Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (3 papers)Spanish History and Politics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaRussiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jill Roe
19 papers receiving 154 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Sociology and Political Science 118
- History 31
- Political Science and International Relations 29
- Economics and Econometrics 28
- Finance 23
Countries citing papers authored by Jill Roe
This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Roe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jill Roe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Roe. The network helps show where Jill Roe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill Roe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill Roe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill Roe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jill Roe. Jill Roe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | A Shadowy figure? Bessie Rischbieth, theosophic feminist | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Faith, hope and history in the year 2000 | 1 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | The world of miles Franklin | 0 |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | Unemployment: Are there lessons from history? | 6 |
| 15 | The Historical Imagination and Its Enemies: M. Barnard Eidershaw's 'Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow' | 1 |
| 16 | A Tale of Religion in Two Cities | 4 |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | The Significant Silence: Miles Franklin's Middle Years | 2 |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Jill Roe
Jill Roe is a scholar working on Music, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (9 papers), Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (3 papers) and Spanish History and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (20 citations), History (31 citations) and Public Administration (10 citations). Jill Roe has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Russia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hugh Stretton, Eric Fry, David Green, Joy Damousi, Donald Horne, Marilyn Lake, Joseph Melling, Alan Powell, Edna Andrews and John D. Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Labour History, Australian Historical Studies and Australian Feminist Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.