Jill Bates

29 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Jill Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 100
  • Family Practice 33
  • Biochemistry 29
  • Pharmacology 33
  • Hematology 40
Replace Dorothee C. Dartsch with:
Dorothee C. Dartsch Germany
Weng-Foung Huang Taiwan
Greg Carney Canada
Sabrina W. Cole United States
Marwan Sheikh‐Taha Lebanon
Â. Fêde Brazil
Anish Desai India
Jane M. Pruemer United States
Eve M. Segal United States
Scott W. Savage United States
Jill Bates relative to Dorothee C. Dartsch Germany Dorothee C. Dartsch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.5×
Dorothee C. Dartsch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jill Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jill Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Bates. The network helps show where Jill Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jill Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jill Bates Line = papers co-authored together Jill Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201952
2 200248
3 201435
4 201631
5 201627
6 201525
7 201119
8 201717
9 200916
10 202112
11 201911
12 20219
13 20179
14 20128
15 20176
16 20226
17 20235
18 20184
19 20224
20 20203

About Jill Bates

Jill Bates is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Hematology, General Health Professions and Oncology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (10 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (3 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (3 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (100 citations), Family Practice (33 citations), Biochemistry (29 citations), Pharmacology (33 citations) and Hematology (40 citations). Jill Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Larry W. Buie, Kristy L. Richards, Nicole R. Pinelli, Kamakshi V. Rao, Lisa M. Holle, Eve M. Segal, Lindsey B. Amerine, Stephen F Eckel, John L.A. Mitchell and Laurence J. Marton. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Pharmacogenomics, Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Blood and Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact