Jesse M. Bering

4.2k total citations
65 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Jesse M. Bering is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jesse M. Bering has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 29 papers in Social Psychology and 16 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jesse M. Bering's work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (17 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (14 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers). Jesse M. Bering is often cited by papers focused on Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (17 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (14 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers). Jesse M. Bering collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Jesse M. Bering's co-authors include David F. Bjorklund, Jared Piazza, Dominic Johnson, Gordon Ingram, Daniel J. Povinelli, Todd K. Shackelford, Carlos Hernández Blasi, Steve Giambrone, Jamin Halberstadt and Ana Stojanov and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Child Development.

In The Last Decade

Jesse M. Bering

60 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jesse M. Bering United States 26 1.2k 1.1k 686 617 526 65 2.4k
Will M. Gervais United States 27 1.9k 1.6× 1.4k 1.2× 964 1.4× 1.2k 1.9× 178 0.3× 45 3.3k
Aiyana K. Willard United Kingdom 20 1.4k 1.2× 924 0.8× 489 0.7× 732 1.2× 164 0.3× 43 2.2k
Dimitris Xygalatas United States 28 1.4k 1.2× 1.3k 1.2× 621 0.9× 561 0.9× 111 0.2× 75 2.6k
Deborah Kelemen United States 29 956 0.8× 1.4k 1.3× 800 1.2× 388 0.6× 1.5k 2.9× 62 3.4k
Richard Sosis United States 28 2.4k 2.1× 993 0.9× 437 0.6× 957 1.6× 76 0.1× 109 3.5k
Ilan Dar‐Nimrod Australia 24 757 0.6× 1.1k 1.0× 336 0.5× 220 0.4× 121 0.2× 58 2.4k
Nicolas Baumard France 25 1.2k 1.0× 646 0.6× 617 0.9× 152 0.2× 279 0.5× 78 1.9k
Dennis L. Krebs Canada 25 1.4k 1.2× 1.1k 1.0× 839 1.2× 169 0.3× 153 0.3× 65 3.0k
Jane L. Risen United States 19 675 0.6× 1.1k 1.0× 820 1.2× 108 0.2× 177 0.3× 41 2.3k
Justin L. Barrett United States 31 2.5k 2.1× 1.8k 1.6× 753 1.1× 2.7k 4.4× 571 1.1× 84 5.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Jesse M. Bering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jesse M. Bering's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jesse M. Bering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jesse M. Bering more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jesse M. Bering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jesse M. Bering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jesse M. Bering. The network helps show where Jesse M. Bering may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jesse M. Bering

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jesse M. Bering. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jesse M. Bering based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jesse M. Bering. Jesse M. Bering is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Bering, Jesse M., et al.. (2022). The value and distinctiveness of awe in science communication: comparing the incidence and content of ‘awesome’ representations in science and non-science picture books. International Journal of Science Education Part B. 12(2). 143–156. 3 indexed citations
3.
Bering, Jesse M., et al.. (2022). Varieties of Awe in Science Communication: Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Practitioners’ Experiences and Uses of This Emotion. Science Communication. 44(3). 347–374. 5 indexed citations
4.
Bering, Jesse M., et al.. (2021). Public faith in science in the United States through the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health in Practice. 2. 100103–100103. 10 indexed citations
5.
Bering, Jesse M., et al.. (2021). Strategies to Stay Alive: Adaptive Toolboxes for Living Well with Suicidal Behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(15). 8013–8013. 6 indexed citations
6.
Bering, Jesse M., et al.. (2020). The construction of awe in science communication. Public Understanding of Science. 30(1). 2–15. 7 indexed citations
7.
Stojanov, Ana, Jesse M. Bering, & Jamin Halberstadt. (2020). Does Perceived Lack of Control Lead to Conspiracy Theory Beliefs? Findings from an online MTurk sample. PLoS ONE. 15(8). e0237771–e0237771. 25 indexed citations
8.
Bering, Jesse M., et al.. (2019). Religious Intuitions and the Nature of “Belief”. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(3). 58–68. 1 indexed citations
9.
Halberstadt, Jamin, et al.. (2019). Aversion to organs donated by suicide victims: The role of psychological essentialism. Cognition. 192. 104037–104037. 2 indexed citations
10.
Bering, Jesse M., et al.. (2013). Die Erweiterungsplastik des ersten Strecksehnenfachs zur operativen Behandlung der Tendovaginitis de Quervain. Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie. 25(4). 361–371. 3 indexed citations
11.
Piazza, Jared, Jesse M. Bering, & Gordon Ingram. (2011). “Princess Alice is watching you”: Children’s belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 109(3). 311–320. 105 indexed citations
12.
Ingram, Gordon & Jesse M. Bering. (2010). Children’s Tattling: The Reporting of Everyday Norm Violations in Preschool Settings. Child Development. 81(3). 945–957. 66 indexed citations
13.
Bering, Jesse M., Cristine H. Legare, Andrew Shtulman, & Harvey Whitehouse. (2009). The cognitive science of religion. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 31(31). 1 indexed citations
14.
Bering, Jesse M.. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 29(5). 453–462. 269 indexed citations
15.
Bering, Jesse M., Carlos Hernández Blasi, & David F. Bjorklund. (2005). The development of afterlife beliefs in religiously and secularly schooled children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 23(4). 587–607. 87 indexed citations
16.
Bering, Jesse M., et al.. (2005). Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends. Human Nature. 16(4). 360–381. 119 indexed citations
17.
Bering, Jesse M. & David F. Bjorklund. (2004). The Natural Emergence of Reasoning About the Afterlife as a Developmental Regularity.. Developmental Psychology. 40(2). 217–233. 209 indexed citations
18.
Bjorklund, David F., et al.. (2001). The generalization of deferred imitation in enculturated chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal Cognition. 5(1). 49–58. 39 indexed citations
19.
Bjorklund, David F., et al.. (2000). A two-year longitudinal study of deferred imitation of object manipulation in a juvenile chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus). Developmental Psychobiology. 37(4). 229–237. 23 indexed citations
20.
Bering, Jesse M., et al.. (2000). Deferred imitation of object-related actions in human-reared juvenile chimpanzees and orangutans. Developmental Psychobiology. 36(3). 218–232. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026