Countries citing papers authored by Jeroen Maesschalck
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeroen Maesschalck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeroen Maesschalck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeroen Maesschalck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeroen Maesschalck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeroen Maesschalck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeroen Maesschalck. The network helps show where Jeroen Maesschalck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeroen Maesschalck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeroen Maesschalck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeroen Maesschalck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jeroen Maesschalck. Jeroen Maesschalck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Maesschalck, Jeroen, et al.. (2021). Digitalisering in de lokale politie in Vlaanderen en Brussel: waar staan we?|. Lirias (KU Leuven). 42(5). 419.
Maesschalck, Jeroen, et al.. (2019). Integriteitsschendingen in 64 lokale politiezones in Vlaanderen: een empirisch onderzoek naar incidentie. Lirias (KU Leuven). 40(3). 167–187.1 indexed citations
Maesschalck, Jeroen. (2012). Kan een integriteitsbeleid in de politie werkelijk een verschil maken op de werkvloer. Lirias (KU Leuven). 2012(4). 111–129.1 indexed citations
8.
Parmentier, Stephan, Lode Walgrave, Ivo Aertsen, Jeroen Maesschalck, & Letizia Paoli. (2011). The Sparking Discipline of Criminology: John Braithwaite and the construction of critical social science and social justice. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
Loyens, Kim & Jeroen Maesschalck. (2008). Het bevorderen en ontwikkelen van een ethisch klimaat in de organisatie. De rol van dilemmatrainingen in een integriteitsbeleid. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
12.
Maesschalck, Jeroen, et al.. (2008). Naar een meetinstrument ter ondersteuning van het ambtelijk integriteitsbeleid. Algemeen Rapport. Survey 'Integriteit op het werk'.1 indexed citations
13.
Behnke, Nathalie & Jeroen Maesschalck. (2007). Symposium: Integrity systems at work - theoretical and empirical foundations, Parts I, II and III. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
14.
Maesschalck, Jeroen & Steven Van de Walle. (2006). Policy Failure and Corruption in Belgium: Is Federalism to Blame?. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
15.
Maesschalck, Jeroen. (2005). Een aanpak voor dilemmatrainingen: een stappenplan voor ethische besluitvorming. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 9(4). 7–19.
16.
Hondeghem, Annie, et al.. (2005). Veranderingsmanagement in de federale overheid : casestudie van de Copernicushervorming. Lirias (KU Leuven).2 indexed citations
Maesschalck, Jeroen, et al.. (2003). Een interdisciplinaire analyse van de klokkenluidersproblematiek in de openbare sector. Lirias (KU Leuven). 58(8). 535–557.5 indexed citations
19.
Maesschalck, Jeroen. (2002). When Do Scandals Have an Impact on Policy Making? A Case Study of the Police Reform Following the Dutroux Scandal in Belgium. International Public Management Journal. 5(2). 169–193.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.