Jeong W. Pak
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology
- Clinical Biochemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- Judd M. AikenDebbie McKenzieRonald P. DanisEntela BuaAllen HerbstAmitha DomalpallyYijun HuangMohamed Bassiouni
- Topics
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments (22 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (12 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEApplied and Environmental Microbiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Jeong W. Pak
40 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Ophthalmology 508
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 456
- Molecular Biology 379
- Physiology 115
- Clinical Biochemistry 89
Countries citing papers authored by Jeong W. Pak
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeong W. Pak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeong W. Pak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeong W. Pak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeong W. Pak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeong W. Pak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeong W. Pak. The network helps show where Jeong W. Pak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeong W. Pak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeong W. Pak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeong W. Pak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeong W. Pak. Jeong W. Pak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | Reference Standards for Assessment of Fluid in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD) | 1 |
| 11 | Correlations Between AMD Severity and OCT Thickness | 1 |
| 12 | Impact of artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography image analysis | 2 |
| 13 | Assessment of OCT angiography image quality in clinical studies | 1 |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 166 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 153 | |
| 18 | 75 | |
| 19 | 68 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Jeong W. Pak
Jeong W. Pak is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (22 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (12 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (508 citations), Aging (38 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (456 citations). Jeong W. Pak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Judd M. Aiken, Debbie McKenzie, Ronald P. Danis, Entela Bua, Allen Herbst, Amitha Domalpally, Yijun Huang, Mohamed Bassiouni, Stacy M. Meuer and Ronald Klein. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.