Xiaoyin Ma

965 citations
36 papers · 714 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaoyin Ma

35 papers receiving 707 citations

Peers

Xiaoyin Ma
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Ophthalmology 121
  • Cell Biology 106
  • Molecular Biology 394
  • Neurology 29
  • Clinical Biochemistry 23
Replace Maxime Hebrard with:
Maxime Hebrard France
Li-Ren Lin United States
Stephen C. Kneeland United States
David Wan‐Cheng Li China
Maria Isabel G. Lopez Sanchez Australia
Judith D. Ochrietor United States
Dayu Li China
Yanhua Qi China
Philip Penn United States
Merideth C. Kamradt United States
Xiaoyin Ma relative to Maxime Hebrard France Maxime Hebrard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Maxime Hebrard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoyin Ma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoyin Ma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoyin Ma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoyin Ma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoyin Ma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoyin Ma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoyin Ma. The network helps show where Xiaoyin Ma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoyin Ma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaoyin Ma Line = papers co-authored together Xiaoyin Ma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200960
2 201956
3 202352
4 201647
5 202040
6 201737
7 202135
8 201931
9 201630
10 201126
11 201626
12 201726
13 201824
14 202224
15 202019
16 201718
17 201316
18 201515
19 201715
20 202115

About Xiaoyin Ma

Xiaoyin Ma is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Sensory Systems, having authored 36 papers that have together received 714 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (15 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (8 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (3 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (2 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (121 citations), Cell Biology (106 citations), Molecular Biology (394 citations), Neurology (29 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (23 citations). Xiaoyin Ma has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Ling Hou, Huirong Li, Yu Chen, James Fielding Hejtmancik, Jia Qu, Xiaodong Jiao, Jianfeng Ren, Fangqing Zhao, Xin Shen and Elisabetta Mueller. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Experimental Eye Research, Cell Death and Disease, Scientific Reports and Redox Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact