This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Schovsbo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Schovsbo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Schovsbo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Schovsbo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Schovsbo. The network helps show where Jens Schovsbo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Schovsbo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Schovsbo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Schovsbo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Schovsbo. Jens Schovsbo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schovsbo, Jens, et al.. (2023). Parody in Danish Copyright Law – The Little Mermaid Judgment. GRURRR. Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Rechtsprechungs-Report/GRUR-DVD/GRUR-CD/IIC/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil. 54(10). 1632–1639.1 indexed citations
3.
Schovsbo, Jens, et al.. (2021). The Protection of Intangible Cultural Assets by Trade secrets and Unfair Competition Law. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Minssen, Timo & Jens Schovsbo. (2018). Big Data in the Health and Life Sciences: What Are the Challenges for European Competition Law and Where Can They Be Found?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 121–130.2 indexed citations
Senftleben, Martin, Lionel Bently, Graeme B. Dinwoodie, et al.. (2015). Recommendation on Measures to Safeguard Freedom of Expression and Undistorted Competition in EU Trade Mark Law. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). 37(6). 337–343.4 indexed citations
9.
Schovsbo, Jens, Martin Senftleben, Graeme B. Dinwoodie, et al.. (2015). The Recommendation on Measures to Safeguard Freedom of Expression and Undistorted Competition::guiding principles for the further development of EU trade mark law. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).3 indexed citations
Schovsbo, Jens, et al.. (2013). Mechanisms for Limiting Trade Mark Rights to Further Competition and Free Speech. GRURRR. Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Rechtsprechungs-Report/GRUR-DVD/GRUR-CD/IIC/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil. 44(6). 671–700.2 indexed citations
13.
Schovsbo, Jens & Thomas Riis. (2012). Extended Collective Licenses in Action. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).
Riis, Thomas & Jens Schovsbo. (2010). Extended Collective Licenses and the Nordic Experience - It’s a Hybrid but is It a Volvo or a Lemon?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 33(4).8 indexed citations
Riis, Thomas & Jens Schovsbo. (2007). Users' Rights: Reconstructing Copyright Policy on Utilitarian Grounds. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 29(1). 1–5.3 indexed citations
19.
Lissoni, Francesco, et al.. (2007). Policy Options for the Improvement of the European Patent System.7 indexed citations
20.
Overwalle, Geertrui Van, et al.. (2007). Policy options for the improvement of the European patent system. Research Publications (Maastricht University). 38. 834–838.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.