Countries citing papers authored by Jens Pistorius
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Pistorius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Pistorius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Pistorius more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Pistorius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Pistorius. The network helps show where Jens Pistorius may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Pistorius
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Pistorius.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Pistorius based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Pistorius. Jens Pistorius is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pistorius, Jens, Silvio Knäbe, Olaf Klein, et al.. (2015). Application of predefined doses of neonicotinoid containing dusts in field trials and acute effects on honey bees. Bulletin of insectology. 68(2). 161–172.26 indexed citations
9.
Dietzsch, Anke C., et al.. (2015). Evaluating the feasibility of using the red mason bee ( Osmia bicornis L.) in different experimental setups. Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut). 174–178.2 indexed citations
10.
Becker, Roland, Johannes Lückmann, & Jens Pistorius. (2015). Effectiveness of method improvements of OECD GD 75 – Evaluation by the ICP-PR Bee Brood Working Group. Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut). 83–92.3 indexed citations
11.
Pistorius, Jens, et al.. (2012). Manuelle Applikation von insektizidhaltigen Beizstäuben in Halbfreilandversuchen mit Honigbienen. Julius-Kühn-Archiv. 465.1 indexed citations
12.
Pistorius, Jens, et al.. (2012). Details on occurrence and frequency of guttation in different crops in Germany. Julius-Kühn-Archiv. 103.3 indexed citations
13.
Schenke, Detlef, et al.. (2010). Verlagerung von Pflanzenschutzmittelwirkstoffen aus behandeltem Saatgut in Guttationstropfen – Erste Ergebnisse. OpenAgrar.1 indexed citations
14.
Schenke, Detlef, et al.. (2010). Guttation - a "new" way of exposition from systemic plant protection products for honeybees?. OpenAgrar. 30–31.1 indexed citations
15.
Pistorius, Jens, et al.. (2010). Gone with the wind - drift of abrasive dust from seed treatments - a risk for honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)?. OpenAgrar.1 indexed citations
16.
Pistorius, Jens, et al.. (2010). Drift von insektizidhaltigen Stäuben auf blühende Bienenweidepflanzen - Expositionsabschätzung und Versuche zu letalen und subletalen Effekten auf Bienen und Bienenvölker. 79.1 indexed citations
17.
Heimbach, Udo, et al.. (2010). Rückstände verschiedener Neonicotinoide in Guttationstropfen von Winterraps im Feldversuch. 468–469.1 indexed citations
Pistorius, Jens, Gabriela Bischoff, Udo Heimbach, & Matthias Stähler. (2009). Bee poisoning incidents in Germany in spring 2008 caused by abrasion of active substance from treated seeds during sowing of maize.. Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut). 118–126.79 indexed citations
20.
Pistorius, Jens, et al.. (2008). Maisanbau und Bienenvergiftungen – Hintergründe und Fakten. 206.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.