Erwin Ladewig
- Plant Science top 10%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Pollution
- Insect Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Bernward MärländerChrista HoffmannNicol StockfischHeinz‐Josef KochJan PetersenA. JungkNorbert ClaassenChristine Kenter
- Topics
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (11 papers)Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (8 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaEuropean Journal of AgronomyCrop Protection
In The Last Decade
Erwin Ladewig
32 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Plant Science 324
- Agronomy and Crop Science 78
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 74
- Pollution 56
- Insect Science 55
Countries citing papers authored by Erwin Ladewig
This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin Ladewig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin Ladewig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin Ladewig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin Ladewig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin Ladewig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin Ladewig. The network helps show where Erwin Ladewig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erwin Ladewig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erwin Ladewig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erwin Ladewig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erwin Ladewig. Erwin Ladewig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Survey of efficacy trials for Conviso® One in sugar beet. | 1 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | Population dynamics of Heterodera schachtii Schm. and yield response of susceptible and resistant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) after cultivation of susceptible and resistant oilseed radish (Raphanus sativus L.) | 5 |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | Wirtschaftlich optimale Höhe der Stickstoff-Düngung zur Zuckerrübe. Eine Betrachtung methodischer Ansätze am Beispiel von 39 niedersächsischen Feldversuchen | 3 |
About Erwin Ladewig
Erwin Ladewig is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (11 papers), Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (8 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (324 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (78 citations) and Soil Science (53 citations). Erwin Ladewig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and India. Frequent co-authors include Bernward Märländer, Christa Hoffmann, Nicol Stockfisch, Heinz‐Josef Koch, Jan Petersen, A. Jungk, Norbert Claassen, Christine Kenter, Mark Varrelmann and Anne‐Katrin Mahlein. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, European Journal of Agronomy and Crop Protection.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.