Jens Bohlken

94 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Jens Bohlken
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 78
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 310
  • Aging 27
  • Biological Psychiatry 34
  • Gastroenterology 65
Replace Maria Rita Lo Monaco with:
Maria Rita Lo Monaco Italy
Xiaodong Luo United States
Catherine M. Milte Australia
Gemma‐Claire Ali United Kingdom
Helen Macpherson Australia
Agnes A. M. Berendsen Netherlands
Paolo Mazzola Italy
Claire T. McEvoy United Kingdom
Ilianna Lourida United Kingdom
Sylvia M. Dobbs United Kingdom
Jens Bohlken relative to Maria Rita Lo Monaco Italy Maria Rita Lo Monaco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Maria Rita Lo Monaco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Bohlken

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Bohlken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Bohlken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Bohlken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Bohlken

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Bohlken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Bohlken. The network helps show where Jens Bohlken may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jens Bohlken, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jens Bohlken Line = papers co-authored together Jens Bohlken links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018124
2 2018120
3 201785
4 201683
5 202077
6 201861
7 202255
8 201649
9 201146
10 202140
11 201936
12 201530
13 201529
14 201827
15 202126
16 202126
17 202025
18 202023
19 202022
20 201618

About Jens Bohlken

Jens Bohlken is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Neurology and Oncology, having authored 109 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (20 papers), Health and Medical Studies (14 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (12 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (8 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (78 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (310 citations), Aging (27 citations), Biological Psychiatry (34 citations) and Gastroenterology (65 citations). Jens Bohlken has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karel Kostev, Louis Jacob, Michael A. Rapp, Bernhard Michalowsky, Agnes Flöel, Theresa Köbe, Steffi G. Riedel‐Heller, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Ulrike Grittner and Slaven Stekovic. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, International Psychogeriatrics, Psychiatry Research, Journal of Psychiatric Research and Epilepsy & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact