Anna Franklin

3.7k citations
82 papers · 2.2k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Franklin

79 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Anna Franklin
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
  • Social Psychology 1.1k
  • Sensory Systems 234
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 788
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 128
Replace Peter Walker with:
Peter Walker United Kingdom
Debi Roberson United Kingdom
Bence Nánay Belgium
Sam Ling United States
Geoff G. Cole United Kingdom
Karina J. Linnell United Kingdom
Kaisa Tiippana Finland
Sang Chul Chong South Korea
Tiziano Agostini Italy
Nele Dael Switzerland
Anna Franklin relative to Peter Walker United Kingdom Peter Walker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Peter Walker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Franklin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Franklin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Franklin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Franklin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Franklin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Franklin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Franklin. The network helps show where Anna Franklin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Franklin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Franklin Line = papers co-authored together Anna Franklin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008136
2 2007121
3 2012107
4 2008101
5 200498
6 200871
7 200571
8 200470
9 201770
10 201470
11 201065
12 201558
13 200857
14 200956
15 201950
16 201349
17 200949
18 201246
19 201444
20 202243

About Anna Franklin

Anna Franklin is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color perception and design (54 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (51 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (40 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (9 papers), Color Science and Applications (7 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (6 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k citations), Social Psychology (1.1k citations), Sensory Systems (234 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (788 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (128 citations). Anna Franklin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Ian Davies, John Maule, Alexandra Clifford, Terry Regier, Paul Kay, Alice E. Skelton, Amanda Holmes, Christoph Witzel, Jenny M. Bosten and Paul T. Sowden. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, British Journal of Developmental Psychology and Vision Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact