Alice E. Skelton

429 total citations
14 papers, 187 citations indexed

About

Alice E. Skelton is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Alice E. Skelton has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 187 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Social Psychology, 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Alice E. Skelton's work include Color perception and design (11 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (8 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers). Alice E. Skelton is often cited by papers focused on Color perception and design (11 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (8 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers). Alice E. Skelton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ecuador and United States. Alice E. Skelton's co-authors include Anna Franklin, Jenny M. Bosten, John Maule, Joshua T. Abbott, Zoe M. Flack, Asifa Majid, Simeon Floyd, George Mather and Nicola Yuill and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Alice E. Skelton

12 papers receiving 175 citations

Peers

Alice E. Skelton
Dimitris Mylonas United Kingdom
Yazhu Ling United Kingdom
Priscilla Heard United Kingdom
Prescott Alexander United States
M. Carrasco United States
Stuart Fuller United States
Sharon E. Guttman United States
Dimitris Mylonas United Kingdom
Alice E. Skelton
Citations per year, relative to Alice E. Skelton Alice E. Skelton (= 1×) peers Dimitris Mylonas

Countries citing papers authored by Alice E. Skelton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alice E. Skelton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alice E. Skelton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alice E. Skelton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alice E. Skelton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alice E. Skelton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alice E. Skelton. The network helps show where Alice E. Skelton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alice E. Skelton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alice E. Skelton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alice E. Skelton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alice E. Skelton. Alice E. Skelton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Yuill, Nicola, et al.. (2025). Sensitivity To natural scene statistics in infancy and its impact on development. Infant Behavior and Development. 80. 102109–102109.
2.
Mather, George, et al.. (2025). The edge orientation entropy of natural scenes is associated with infant visual preferences and adult aesthetic judgements. PLoS ONE. 20(2). e0316555–e0316555. 1 indexed citations
3.
Skelton, Alice E., et al.. (2024). The perceived beauty of art is not strongly calibrated to the statistical regularities of real-world scenes. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 19368–19368.
4.
Skelton, Alice E., John Maule, Simeon Floyd, et al.. (2024). Effects of visual diet on colour discrimination and preference. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 291(2031). 20240909–20240909. 6 indexed citations
5.
Bosten, Jenny M., et al.. (2023). Chromatic and spatial image statistics predict infants’ visual preferences and adults’ aesthetic preferences for art. Journal of Vision. 23(8). 2–2. 6 indexed citations
6.
Skelton, Alice E., Anna Franklin, & Jenny M. Bosten. (2023). Colour vision is aligned with natural scene statistics at 4 months of age. Developmental Science. 26(6). e13402–e13402. 15 indexed citations
7.
8.
Skelton, Alice E., John Maule, & Anna Franklin. (2022). Infant color perception: Insight into perceptual development. Child Development Perspectives. 16(2). 90–95. 17 indexed citations
9.
Maule, John, Alice E. Skelton, & Anna Franklin. (2022). The Development of Color Perception and Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology. 74(1). 87–111. 43 indexed citations
10.
Maule, John, Simeon Floyd, Alice E. Skelton, et al.. (2021). Measuring the human “chromatic diet” and its relation to preference for color distributions across cultures. Journal of Vision. 21(9). 2514–2514. 1 indexed citations
11.
Maule, John, et al.. (2021). ColourSpot, a novel gamified tablet-based test for accurate diagnosis of color vision deficiency in young children. Behavior Research Methods. 54(3). 1148–1160. 11 indexed citations
12.
Skelton, Alice E., Simeon Floyd, John Maule, et al.. (2021). Is color discrimination influenced by the chromatic statistics of different visual environments?. Journal of Vision. 21(9). 1945–1945. 2 indexed citations
13.
Skelton, Alice E. & Anna Franklin. (2019). Infants look longer at colours that adults like when colours are highly saturated. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 27(1). 78–85. 14 indexed citations
14.
Skelton, Alice E., et al.. (2017). Biological origins of color categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(21). 5545–5550. 70 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026