Thomas L. Smith

7.9k citations
199 papers · 6.9k · h-index 43

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas L. Smith

195 papers receiving 6.5k citations

Peers

Thomas L. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Surgery 1.4k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 354
  • Neurology 325
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 123
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 151
Replace Raffaele De with:
Raffaele De Italy
Andrea Porzionato Italy
Veronica Macchi Italy
Mustafa Fevzi Sargon Türkiye
Huazi Xu China
Peter R. Brink United States
Xiangyang Wang China
Gen Inoue Japan
Michael B. Chancellor United States
Heikki J Ruskoaho Finland
Thomas L. Smith relative to Raffaele De Italy Raffaele De's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.5×
Raffaele De · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Smith. The network helps show where Thomas L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas L. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas L. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Thomas L. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 199 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005398
2 2005387
3 2007301
4 2004279
5 2014238
6 1988156
7 2008145
8 1979144
9 2012132
10 2003129
11 2007107
12
Ice reduces edema. A study of microvascular permeability in rats.
2002104
13 2008101
14 201399
15 201694
16 200291
17 200389
18 200582
19 197976
20 198072

About Thomas L. Smith

Thomas L. Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Neurology and Physiology, having authored 199 papers that have together received 6.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (10 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (9 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (8 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (8 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers) and Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (1.4k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (354 citations), Neurology (325 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (123 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (151 citations). Thomas L. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include L. Andrew Koman, Mark E. Van Dyke, Beth Paterson Smith, Phillip M. Hutchins, Michael F. Callahan, John S. Parks, Perry L. Colvin, Elena Y. Boudyguina, Sandeep Mannava and Abraham K. Gebre. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal Of Hand Surgery, Life Sciences, Journal of Orthopaedic Research®, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Journal of Lipid Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact