Jeanine Krath

11 papers receiving 504 citations

Hit Papers

Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A system...20212026202220242021100200300400

Peers

Jeanine Krath
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 338
  • Sociology and Political Science 131
  • Education 99
  • Computer Science Applications 91
  • Information Systems 67
Replace Linda Schürmann with:
Linda Schürmann Germany
Ana Carolina Tomé Klock Brazil
Anissa All Belgium
Sheng-Chin Yu Taiwan
Élise Lavoué France
Fong-Ling Fu Taiwan
Rudy McDaniel United States
Jonah B. Firestone United States
Alberto Mora Spain
Rina R. Wehbe Canada
Jeanine Krath relative to Linda Schürmann Germany Linda Schürmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Linda Schürmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeanine Krath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeanine Krath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeanine Krath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeanine Krath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeanine Krath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeanine Krath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeanine Krath. The network helps show where Jeanine Krath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeanine Krath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeanine Krath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeanine Krath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeanine Krath. Jeanine Krath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 0
3 4
4 6
5 2
6 21
7 19
8 9
9 1
10 6
11
Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learningbreakdown →
445
12
Designing gamification and persuasive systems: A systematic literature review.
18
13 1

About Jeanine Krath

Jeanine Krath is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Games and Gamification (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (338 citations), Computer Science Applications (91 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (66 citations). Jeanine Krath has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Harald F. O. von Korflesch, Linda Schürmann, Bastian Kordyaka, Samuli Laato, Lennart E. Nacke, Maximilian Altmeyer, Gustavo F. Tondello, Benedikt Morschheuser, Annakaisa Kultima and Miikka J. Lehtonen. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Journal of Medical Internet Research and International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026