This map shows the geographic impact of Jean Daniélou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean Daniélou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean Daniélou more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean Daniélou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean Daniélou. The network helps show where Jean Daniélou may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean Daniélou
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean Daniélou.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean Daniélou based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jean Daniélou. Jean Daniélou is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Daniélou, Jean. (2024). Sortir du monde fossile. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository.
Daniélou, Jean. (1956). Les saints "païens" de l'Ancien Testament. Éditions du Seuil eBooks.
19.
Daniélou, Jean. (1955). La vie de Moïse, ou, Traité de la perfection en matière de vertu.
20.
Daniélou, Jean. (1953). Essai sur le mystère de l'histoire. Seuil eBooks.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.