Jay Zagorsky

1.4k citations
39 papers · 965 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Zagorsky

36 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

Jay Zagorsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Gender Studies 185
  • Demography 200
  • Accounting 186
  • Finance 85
  • General Health Professions 214
Replace Peter Burton with:
Peter Burton Canada
Maximilian D. Schmeiser United States
Emla Fitzsimons United Kingdom
Jason N. Houle United States
Caroline Ratcliffe United States
Frank Heiland United States
Mark H. Showalter United States
Thomas A. Hirschl United States
Dean R. Lillard United States
Silvia Barcellos United States
Jay Zagorsky relative to Peter Burton Canada Peter Burton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Peter Burton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Zagorsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Zagorsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Zagorsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Zagorsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Zagorsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Zagorsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Zagorsky. The network helps show where Jay Zagorsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jay Zagorsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Zagorsky Line = papers co-authored together Jay Zagorsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007131
2 2001122
3 2005118
4 200586
5 201765
6 200958
7 199953
8 200350
9 201135
10 201733
11 200826
12 200423
13 200821
14 199818
15 200415
16 202014
17 201214
18 200511
19
Health and the Working Poor
19999
20
E-mail, computer usage and college students: a case study
19979

About Jay Zagorsky

Jay Zagorsky is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 965 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (8 papers), Global Health Care Issues (6 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (185 citations), Demography (200 citations), Accounting (186 citations), Finance (85 citations) and General Health Professions (214 citations). Jay Zagorsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Patricia K. Smith, Kevin Lang, Monica Galizzi, Alyssa Bryant Rockenbach, Matthew J. Mayhew and Alyssa N. Rockenbach. Their work appears in journals such as Economics & Human Biology, Social Science Quarterly, Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, Journal of sociology and American Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact