Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins

523 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 523 indexed citations. Written by Yue Shi, Zhen Xia, Jiajing Zhang, Robert B. Best, Chuanjie Wu, Jay W. Ponder and Pengyu Ren covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Physiology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (311 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (254 citations) and Materials Chemistry (153 citations). Published in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation.

Countries where authors are citing Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ct4003702.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026