Jay M. Smith
Impact in
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
- History top 2%
- European Political History Analysis
Papers in
- History 8
- European Political History Analysis 8
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 6
- Co-authors
- Sharon Kettering (1 shared paper)Joseph J. Schultz (1 shared paper)Rafe Blaufarb (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Modern History (3 papers)The American Historical Review (3 papers)French History (1 paper)History and Theory (1 paper)Modern Intellectual History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jay M. Smith
21 papers receiving 106 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- History and Philosophy of Science 48
- History 62
- Museology 16
- Anthropology 35
- Accounting 27
Countries citing papers authored by Jay M. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Jay M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay M. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jay M. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay M. Smith. The network helps show where Jay M. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Jay M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 20 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 19 | |
| 3 | Reorienting accounting education : reports on the environment, professoriate, and curriculum of accounting | 1989 | 18 |
| 4 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 14 | The teacher as learning facilitator: Psychology and the educational process | 1979 | 3 |
| 15 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1969 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 19 | Introductory Accounting Objectives and Intermediate Accounting Perf ormance | 2016 | 1 |
| 20 | Ultrasound evaluation of TIPS placement. | 2000 | 1 |
About Jay M. Smith
Jay M. Smith is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 23 papers that have together received 158 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Political History Analysis (8 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (6 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (1 paper), African history and culture studies (1 paper) and Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (48 citations), History (62 citations), Museology (16 citations), Anthropology (35 citations) and Accounting (27 citations). Jay M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sharon Kettering, Joseph J. Schultz and Rafe Blaufarb. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Modern History, The American Historical Review, French History, History and Theory and Modern Intellectual History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.