Jay Jennings

568 citations
17 papers · 341 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Jennings

17 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

Jay Jennings
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Communication 159
  • Health 43
  • Sociology and Political Science 231
  • Political Science and International Relations 119
  • Public Administration 9
Replace Kevin Gillan with:
Kevin Gillan United Kingdom
Andreas C. Goldberg Netherlands
Anna Brosius Netherlands
Eri Bertsou Switzerland
Benjamin Schneer United States
Jacob R. Neiheisel United States
Patrick F. A. van Erkel Belgium
Ronggui Huang China
Yamil Velez United States
Morgan Marietta United States
Jay Jennings relative to Kevin Gillan United Kingdom Kevin Gillan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Kevin Gillan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Jennings

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Jennings's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Jennings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Jennings more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Jennings

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Jennings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Jennings. The network helps show where Jay Jennings may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jay Jennings, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Jennings Line = papers co-authored together Jay Jennings links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201780
2 201963
3 201951
4 201946
5 202137
6 202019
7 201018
8 202113
9 20165
10 20212
11
Religious Motivation and the Democratic Citizen
20151
12 20171
13
The Prejudice Paradox: How Religious Motivations Explain the Complex Relationship between Religion and Prejudice
20141
14 20241
15
Carry the Rock: Race, Football, and the Soul of an American City
20101
16 20241
17 20201

About Jay Jennings

Jay Jennings is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Health and Gender Studies, having authored 17 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Media Influence and Politics (4 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Media Studies and Communication (2 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (2 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (159 citations), Health (43 citations), Sociology and Political Science (231 citations), Political Science and International Relations (119 citations) and Public Administration (9 citations). Jay Jennings has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Katherine Haenschen, Natalie Jomini Stroud, Nicolas Anspach, Kevin Arceneaux, Derek A. Epp, Gina Masullo Chen, Joseph McLaughlin, Sharon E. Jarvis, Rashawn Ray and Todd R. Vogel. Their work appears in journals such as Research & Politics, Annals of Vascular Surgery, New Media & Society, Journal of Information Technology & Politics and Urban Affairs Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact