Anna Brosius

869 citations
23 papers · 468 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Brosius

23 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Anna Brosius
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Communication 199
  • Sociology and Political Science 303
  • Political Science and International Relations 125
  • Health 24
  • Artificial Intelligence 83
Replace Mingxiao Sui with:
Mingxiao Sui United States
Nicoleta Corbu Romania
Joshua M. Scacco United States
Marco Dohle Germany
Michael W. Kearney United States
Sahar Khamis United States
Jiyoun Suk United States
Thomas Zerback Germany
Bruno Castanho Silva Germany
Melanie Magin Norway
Anna Brosius relative to Mingxiao Sui United States Mingxiao Sui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Mingxiao Sui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Brosius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Brosius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Brosius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Brosius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Brosius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Brosius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Brosius. The network helps show where Anna Brosius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Anna Brosius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Brosius Line = papers co-authored together Anna Brosius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202267
2 202048
3 202141
4 201934
5 201831
6 201928
7 201823
8 202121
9 202118
10 201918
11
WhatsApp Marketing: A Study on WhatsApp Brand Communication and the Role of Trust in Self-Disclosure
202118
12 201715
13 202214
14 201914
15 202113
16 202112
17 202012
18 20219
19 20219
20 20218

About Anna Brosius

Anna Brosius is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 23 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (13 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (9 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (5 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (4 papers), Media Influence and Politics (3 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (199 citations), Sociology and Political Science (303 citations), Political Science and International Relations (125 citations), Health (24 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (83 citations). Anna Brosius has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Ireland and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Claes H. de Vreese, Michael Hameleers, Erika J. van Elsas, Toni G.L.A. van der Meer, Franziska Marquart, Andreas C. Goldberg, Martijn Schoonvelde, Gijs Schumacher, Bert N. Bakker and Jakob Ohme. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of European Integration, European Union Politics, European Journal of Communication, International Journal of Public Opinion Research and West European Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact