Jay Clayton

626 citations
52 papers · 192 indexed · h-index 7

Jay Clayton

37 papers receiving 101 citations

Peers

Jay Clayton
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Literature and Literary Theory 66
  • Philosophy 28
  • Cultural Studies 16
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 9
  • Music 5
Replace James Berger with:
James Berger United States
Seán Burke United States
Robert Weisbuch United States
Philip Swanson United Kingdom
Barbara Godard Canada
Marianne Novy United States
Thomas Foster United Kingdom
SHEILA M. SMITH United Kingdom
Benjamin Reiss United States
Juan Eduardo Cirlot
Jay Clayton relative to James Berger United States James Berger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
James Berger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Clayton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Clayton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Clayton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Clayton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Clayton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Clayton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Clayton. The network helps show where Jay Clayton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jay Clayton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Clayton Line = papers co-authored together Jay Clayton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20251
3 20242
4 20241
5 20231
6 20211
7 20216
8 20136
9
The Queen of Spades: A Seriously Intended Joke
20090
10 200323
11
Chekhov then and now : the reception of Chekhov in world culture
19974
12 19951
13 19945
14 199112
15 19907
16 198914
17
Poetica Slavica : studies in honour of Zbigniew Folejewski
19813
18 19801
19
Music for 18 musicians
19788
20 19710

About Jay Clayton

Jay Clayton is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Anthropology, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 52 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Perceptions (8 papers), Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (6 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (5 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (4 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (4 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers), European Linguistics and Anthropology (3 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (66 citations), Philosophy (28 citations), Cultural Studies (16 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (9 citations) and Music (5 citations). Jay Clayton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Margery Sabin, John E. Bowlt, Priscilla Wald, Steve Reich, Rebecca Armstrong, Elizabeth R. Arnold, Michael C. Shapiro, Betsy Draine, A. C. Bradley and Bradley Malin. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Slavonic Papers, The Slavic and East European Journal, Medical Humanities, American Literature and Nineteenth-Century Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026