Jared Warren

728 citations
34 papers · 302 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jared Warren

28 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Jared Warren
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • History and Philosophy of Science 95
  • Theoretical Computer Science 19
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 177
  • Philosophy 128
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 37
Replace Alexander Paseau with:
Alexander Paseau United Kingdom
Fraser MacBride United Kingdom
Gabriel Uzquiano United States
Paul Cortois Belgium
Jamie Tappenden United States
Gillian Russell United States
Juliet Floyd United States
Bernard Linsky Canada
David Liggins United Kingdom
Matthias Schirn Germany
Jared Warren relative to Alexander Paseau United Kingdom Alexander Paseau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Alexander Paseau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jared Warren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jared Warren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jared Warren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jared Warren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jared Warren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jared Warren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jared Warren. The network helps show where Jared Warren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jared Warren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jared Warren Line = papers co-authored together Jared Warren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201954
2 202041
3 201419
4 202218
5 201818
6 199915
7 201615
8 201414
9 201613
10 201610
11 201610
12 20019
13 20169
14 20149
15 20168
16 20208
17
Talking with Tonkers
20156
18 20205
19 20174
20 20164

About Jared Warren

Jared Warren is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 34 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (23 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (10 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (95 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (19 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (177 citations), Philosophy (128 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (37 citations). Jared Warren has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Andrew M. Stuart, Nicolás S. Piuzzi, John P. McLaughlin, Carlos A. Higuera, Brendan M. Patterson, Hiba K. Anis, Kavin Sundaram, Endre Süli, Eli Hirsch and B. Cano. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Synthese, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Philosophical Quarterly and Journal of Philosophical Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact