Jantine Scheele

14 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Jantine Scheele
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Pharmacology 263
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 22
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 123
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 77
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 26
Replace Pierre de Goumoëns with:
Pierre de Goumoëns Switzerland
Andreas Eklund Sweden
Jasper D. Bier Netherlands
Nadège Lemeunier Canada
Robert Simard Canada
L. Bontoux France
Claudia Eisenring Switzerland
Aminu A. Ibrahim Nigeria
Greg McIntosh Canada
Peter Lövgren Denmark
Jantine Scheele relative to Pierre de Goumoëns Switzerland Pierre de Goumoëns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pierre de Goumoëns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jantine Scheele

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jantine Scheele's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jantine Scheele with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jantine Scheele more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jantine Scheele

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jantine Scheele. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jantine Scheele. The network helps show where Jantine Scheele may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jantine Scheele, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jantine Scheele Line = papers co-authored together Jantine Scheele links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201172
2 201341
3 201340
4 201540
5 201231
6
Course of back complaints in older adults: a systematic literature review.
201223
7 201422
8 202021
9 201316
10
[Tramadol and pentazocine in a clinical double-blind crossover comparison].
197813
11 20137
12 20235
13 20223
14 20111

About Jantine Scheele

Jantine Scheele is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (263 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (22 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (123 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (77 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (26 citations). Jantine Scheele has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Bart W. Koes, Pim A. J. Luijsterburg, Sita Bierma‐Zeinstra, Marjolein Y. Berger, Maurits W. van Tulder, Arthur M. Bohnen, Wilco C. Peul, Wendy T. M. Enthoven, Herman Bueving and Christopher G. Maher. Their work appears in journals such as Pain Medicine, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Physical Therapy, Midwifery and Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact